On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 02:21:41PM -0500, Jerry Amundson wrote: >> So now, more of my time is required to shoehorn in a custom anaconda >> package for F20 to accomplish what I need, and I'm darn unhappy about >> it. >> Thanks for listening, > > Hi Jerry. Happy to listen. Remember that Fedora is a community project, and > that some code paths don't get well tested if no one in the community is > using them. Apparently that's the case here -- I know that from my > experience, kickstart over the network is pretty normal. > > For shoehorning in the update, take a look at this: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Updates > > Basically, you can provide an "updates.img" at runtime to fix your issue. At > least, I hope so -- the network problem might be a special case, but it's > worth trying. That's exactly what I needed! I'd seen it before, but never went to the page as I assumed it was for rpm updates to other packages. Yes, it works even in the network case... > I think it's pretty awesome that you're using Fedora in your product. It > might be worth your time in future releases to help test functions that are > critical to you in each new Fedora, even if you're not rebasing your product > to that. I'll do that. Thanks again, this response was perfect. jerry _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
