On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Colin Walters <walters@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hello,
I haven't seen much active discussion go by about Anaconda and
Fedora.next. So a breakdown:
Early accidental Control-Return. So...
Server:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server/Technical_Specification
Workstation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/Technical_Specification
Cloud:
Still TODO:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud/Cloud_ToDo#technical_specifications
Anyways a high level question I have: do we forsee producing
separately-branded install media for Server and Workstation? Right now
it says "Welcome to Fedora"...should that change?
I am thinking at the moment that the Fedora Cloud Docker Host:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Docker_Cloud_Image
would be separately branded for several reasons. A technical reason to
have a distinct installation media is that there's no UI for ostree
right now in Anaconda, you have to enable it via kickstart.
I'm not sure if anyone from either Server or Workstation is actively
following up on their Anaconda goals from the spec. Is there any
discussion between the Anaconda group and those two that I've missed?
I have seen discussion of Anaconda + Cloud, but that case is very
different as cloud *users* don't see Anaconda's UI generally, it's just
a kickstart processor.
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
