On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 12:58 AM, Vratislav Podzimek
<vpodzime@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Other than that I believe that we shouldn't do any workarounds for
something that new systemd+udev version broke. If any package
seriously
breaks the system, it should be reverted or fixed ASAP.
It is fixed now apparently:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=9ea28c55a2488e6cd4a44ac5786f12b71ad5bc9f
It's not other
packages' (and their mantainers') responsibility to work around those
issues.
I don't think the issue is as black-and-white as that. Sometimes it's
worthwhile to carry fixes in two places, and in this case it's a
completely safe one-liner.
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
