On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 15:52 +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 15:17 +0100, Martin Kolman wrote: > > On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 14:56 +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > > > On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 14:43 +0100, Martin Kolman wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 13:26 +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 11:10 +0100, Vratislav Podzimek wrote: > > > > > > Could you please resend your patches to > > > > > > anaconda-patches@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and add a '[grub]' prefix to the > > > > > > subjects? > > > > > > > > > > I've tried to, but the messages bounced: > > > > > > > > > > You are not allowed to post to this mailing list, and your message has > > > > > been automatically rejected. If you think that your messages are > > > > > being rejected in error, contact the mailing list owner at > > > > > anaconda-patches-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. > > > > > > > Oh, you need to subscribe to the anaconda-patches list, > > > > or your emails will bounce. > > > > We started requiring that after having issues with spam. > ... > > > Seriously, it beats me how would me getting all the patches help you > > > resolve the issues with spam... > ... > > BTW, any suggestions for alternative solutions to the spam problem ? > > I still don't quite understand how was sending the patches to everyone > that is willing to submit a patch is supposed to cope with the spam > problem. Would you mind explaining? As I understand it, the spambots don't subscribe to the mailing list, so their emails are rejected. Real users subscribe and their emails are accepted. If a user turns out to be a spambot, you unsubscribe him (not sure if this happened so far). That's pretty much it. BTW, I think Chris Lumens is handling the Anaconda mailing lists, so he might know more. > > Thanks, > Lubo > _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
