On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 12:12 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: > I was wondering what the protocol is for submitting patches. > > Recently, (November 8th), I submitted a two part patch (anaconda and > pykickstart) which implements new functionality adding the "reclaim" > option to the kickstart btrfs command. > > The reclaim option (the name was chosen because of the similar function > available in non-kickstart custom disk allocation) allows an existing > btrfs subvolume to be specified for mountpoints such as root where the > subvolume's filesystem/device must be destroyed before the can be newly > created using the same name. This will also recover (reclaim) the disk > space used by the previous subvolume. > > Now, at this late date, there is not way that I expect this to be > incorporated into Fedora 20. However, having this languish on the > patches mailing list can also have it easily forgotten. > > So, for non-official anaconda/pykickstart/blivet/etc. developers who > submit patches, what should we expect to happen. If something does not > happen withing <?> should we "ping" this or the patches mailing list? Yes, feel free to "ping" us on the patches list. It sometimes happens that patches stay unreviewed for a long time and may get forgotten completely then. -- Vratislav Podzimek Anaconda Rider | Red Hat, Inc. | Brno - Czech Republic _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
