On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 14:07 -0500, Chris Lumens wrote: > > It would be a shame if the Anaconda feedback went unnoticed just > > because the developers are not subscribed to that list. I recommend > > all of you to subscribe to test-list, or at least read the archives > > periodically, to see what parts of NewUI are the most problematic ones > > for our users. Your response to some of the questions would also be > > appreciated. > > Sorry, but no. I have unsubscribed from that list. The level of > vitriol and personal attacks on there is just too high for me to deal > with. I don't need to spend my days reading people who refuse to > participate dump on the last fifteen months of my hard work. > > Perhaps one day if Fedora cleans up its lists and actually enforces the > "be excellent to each other" thing, I can resubscribe. But for now, > it's a quality of life thing and I don't need this. It's hard to be too liberal with the banhammer on a prominent list like test@ (easier on a focused one), but I was serious in threatening Tom with it: if he steps over the line one more time I _will_ propose in a meeting that we give him a temporary list ban. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
