Re: Bill's patch for software selection + comps metadata

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Máirín Duffy (duffy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> - 'Installation Type' is maybe an odd term to use. We talked about using
> the term 'Environment' instead - that term is inclusive of all the
> desktop options and (no-desktop) minimal install that are in that
> selection box.
> 
> - We use the term 'install class' a lot, so it might be better to pick a
> different term. Bill has used install class here to mean a desktop + the
> comps groups that are compatible with it = a base package set. Some
> alternatives Bill proposed (with some thesaurus help):
> 
> selection
> collection
> combination
> compilation
> assembly
> mix
> 
> My suggestion is to use "environment collection" (even though it's long)
> because I think collection is the most appropriate term (a group of
> sets, think Flickr 'collections' vs 'sets') but it's also important to
> use the term 'environment' in it so that someone looking at the comps
> knows that it relates to the 'environment' widget in the UI.

If it's 'Environment' in the UI, I'm fine with using that in the code too;
there's no reason to call it 'environment collection' - environment works
fine.

Bill

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list



[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux