Neither work at present. Hence my comment about "degraded or degenerate". Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 16:03:37 -0700, > "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>1. The user doesn't trust you at all, and physically disconnects a >RAID >>member from the set before allowing Anaconda to touch the disk. >Anaconda >>will not see the disk because it is not there to be seen. >> >>2. The user knows he wants to add redundancy later, or intends to run >>single disk but wants seamless transition to new hardware when needed >>(+Brendan Conoboy's scenario.) >> >>3. The user wants to break the RAID in software during installation. >>This eliminates the need to crack the case, but assumes one trusts the >>software to not screw it up. This does have some nice features, but >>definitely requires a lot of UI work in order to prevent mistakes. > >None of those cases requires installing to a degraded array. You can >change >the array to not be degraded before doing the install. (This assumes >you >are talking about pulling one disk from a software raid 1 array.) I am >not sure what the limitations are for install to raid 1 arrays with >only >one element are these days. I think the way it used to work, is that >you >couldn't create such an array in the installed, but you could use one >if >it was already set up. -- Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting. _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
