Re: Degraded RAID-1 installs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 16:03:37 -0700,
  "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

1. The user doesn't trust you at all, and physically disconnects a RAID
member from the set before allowing Anaconda to touch the disk. Anaconda
will not see the disk because it is not there to be seen.

2. The user knows he wants to add redundancy later, or intends to run
single disk but wants seamless transition to new hardware when needed
(+Brendan Conoboy's scenario.)

3. The user wants to break the RAID in software during installation.
This eliminates the need to crack the case, but assumes one trusts the
software to not screw it up. This does have some nice features, but
definitely requires a lot of UI work in order to prevent mistakes.

None of those cases requires installing to a degraded array. You can change the array to not be degraded before doing the install. (This assumes you are talking about pulling one disk from a software raid 1 array.) I am not sure what the limitations are for install to raid 1 arrays with only one element are these days. I think the way it used to work, is that you couldn't create such an array in the installed, but you could use one if it was already set up.

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list


[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux