On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 11:08 -0400, Chris Lumens wrote: > > As I've seen the cases while testing these patches, those > > x.fedora.pool.ntp.org servers (and probably the other .pool. severs as > > well) are working (reachable and returning data) at most one in the > > time. So my concern was that users would uncheck the others if they are > > marked as not working resulting in a setup with only one of the .pool. > > servers, which is not intended. > > > > > > > > (2) You're assuming that the OS even has pool servers configured. > > > Fedora does, but does RHEL? Do rebuilds? > > I don't see any problem in displaying the note even if there are no such > > servers configured. > > Can you conditionalize it so the message only appears if there are .pool > servers present in the store? I think that might take care of my > concerns about both message content and having it displayed if there's > nothing that requires it. Of course, that should be easy to change. -- Vratislav Podzimek Anaconda Rider | Red Hat, Inc. | Brno - Czech Republic _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
