> As I've seen the cases while testing these patches, those > x.fedora.pool.ntp.org servers (and probably the other .pool. severs as > well) are working (reachable and returning data) at most one in the > time. So my concern was that users would uncheck the others if they are > marked as not working resulting in a setup with only one of the .pool. > servers, which is not intended. > > > > > (2) You're assuming that the OS even has pool servers configured. > > Fedora does, but does RHEL? Do rebuilds? > I don't see any problem in displaying the note even if there are no such > servers configured. Can you conditionalize it so the message only appears if there are .pool servers present in the store? I think that might take care of my concerns about both message content and having it displayed if there's nothing that requires it. Also, I'm still thinking about what might be better to use for icons. I'll see if mizmo has any input. We can always make changes later, of course. - Chris _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
