> The important thing is this: I'd like to get us using treebuilder to > build rawhide images ASAP - that means merging treebuilder into master. > Is everyone OK with this? Yeah, let's get this going on master right away. > And that leads to a second question: what do we do for F16? I don't feel > like treebuilder is ready for F16 yet, but the squashfs/dracut-based > implementation in lorax's f16-branch is.. immature, and very different > from the treebuilder one. So, should we: > > a) rush treebuilder for F16, > b) keep lorax/anaconda images as-is for F16, even though we'll be > changing it again in F17, or > c) revert the squashfs stuff in f16-branch and build f15-style images > again for F16? Given where we are in the schedule, I'd say (b) is the best choice. (a) is too drastic, and (c) removes working (though maybe not perfect) code in favor of something we haven't tested in a while. - Chris _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
