Re: archive-installer integration patchlet question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:42:02AM -0400, Chris Lumens wrote:
> > This is the patch I started working on for trying to integrate the
> > archive backend (along with a temporary change in default for my
> > testing purposes).  I have no idea if this is the right direction
> > towards correctly integrating the archive backend into anaconda
> > proper and would definitely appreciate feedback.  Thanks!
> 
> It's not pretty, but yes I think that's the best that could be done
> right now.  I hate having to do a new flag just for a different backend,
> but see no good alternative.  The only other idea would be that you have
> your own install class with its own getBackend method, but then you've
> just moved the problem to how you pick the install class to use.

Thanks -- that's what I'd come up with too -- making a new installClass
seemed to be not only more code to maintain but less benefit.

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list


[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux