On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:43:12AM -0500, David Lehman wrote: > On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 14:37 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote: > > This is because the information that FSSet provides depends on the > > information udev is able to provide and this is incomplete for certain > > virtual DVD drives. > > The right answer seems to be either "NACK -- this is a udev bug" or > "ACK, conditional on you filing a bug against udev". In the latter case, > maybe we should even make a statement that the hack will be removed > prior to F16 Alpha so don't let up on udev maintainers for a real fix. I vote for nack, this is a udev bug. The reason why we use udev is so that we don't need to have exceptions like this. -- Brian C. Lane | Anaconda Team | IRC: bcl #anaconda | Port Orchard, WA (PST8PDT)
Attachment:
pgpGUOPajDhcc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
