> That way we have no idea/control about what gets installed. Is it what > we want? Do we absolutely always want to install all packages containing > firmware no matter what? Remember that we are using blacklist, no > whitelist, so it stays there. Well, the problem as I see it is that we are only installing a static list of firmware packages. This list of course may not contain the firmware blobs that the kernel modules we install require. That's because the two pieces of information are under the control of two different groups - we control the list of what firmware packages to install, the kernel controls what blobs are actually required. At the minimum, it seems like we should query the installed modules for what firmware they require, look up what package provides that firmware, and add it to the list of packages to install into our images. The easier, stupider fix is to just install all firmware packages. You'll note that we don't really control which kernel modules get installed anyway. Stuff like "=net" ensures that. Otherwise, we're just going to get hit by this problem again and again. - Chris _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
