> What a catch, thanks! I am thinking about it and if the lists are > used and then processed at one point it also orders all the skips > before all the unskips across all the kickstart commands, not just > per command. So in the new patch I sent I am using the lists again > and then process them all at once after the kickstart execution > step. Well, all those lists and stuff probably made more sense at some point in the past than they do now. But yes, having it all in the setSteps is pretty nice. > Yeah, me too and it is on my to do list, but for a separate job > (where I'll also try to tackle X server and metacity startup). Also > see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697698. Perhaps for > sshd we will be able to use the system systemd config (I do not > think that will be possible for the X server though). Ah, looks good. With X and metacity, you've got gdm in there as well starting everything up. I guess we could go through gdm as well, if we had to. - Chris _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
