> I was considering merging this to mount code, but I decided to abstract the options=r?,remount from the high level logic. I would have to add remount= argument to the mount call as we pass the remount option to isys in this form. > > This code also behaves more like unmount call (checking for mounted and existing filesystem first). On the other hand there is a significant part common with the mount call too, especially the SElinux handling. Unless dlehman strenuously objects, I guess it's okay. But I can just see us having to add more duplication should the mount method ever need to get more complicated. - Chris _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
