> The reversed traceback: well I'd need to (try to) instantiate > meh.dump.ReverseExceptionDump (or duplicate the code in it) to mimic > the format precisely, which I'd rather not (especially the code > duplication). I always assumed the only reason we do the reverse > traceback in dumps is "because we can", although Martin Sivak just > told me it could be because in some cases the traceback can be cut > off in the end and then we'd miss the important bits. The reason we reverse the tracebacks is so that when people post a single screenshot or something, then we will at least have the most specific part of the traceback. > Anyway: is the reversed traceback really more readable for you (or > anyone)? Perhaps it is even the time to move away from it and have > it the same way Python has it naturally. >From a consistency perspective, it would be nice to have. I wouldn't spend too much time on it if you have more important things to do, though. - Chris _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list