> diff --git a/pyanaconda/storage/formats/fs.py b/pyanaconda/storage/formats/fs.py
> index c3ea79c..0d01fd4 100644
> --- a/pyanaconda/storage/formats/fs.py
> +++ b/pyanaconda/storage/formats/fs.py
> @@ -1101,7 +1101,7 @@ class BTRFS(FS):
> _linuxNative = True
> _bootable = False
> _maxLabelChars = 256
> - _supported = False
> + _supported = True
> _dump = True
> _check = True
> _packages = ["btrfs-progs"]
> @@ -1125,15 +1125,6 @@ class BTRFS(FS):
> argv = ["-r", "%dm" % (self.targetSize,), self.device]
> return argv
>
> - @property
> - def supported(self):
> - """ Is this filesystem a supported type? """
> - supported = self._supported
> - if flags.cmdline.has_key("btrfs"):
> - supported = self.utilsAvailable
> -
> - return supported
> -
> register_device_format(BTRFS)
This looks like it would work. I wonder if it's the right time to do
this, though. What's btrfs support look like in the kernel and user
space tools? Has it stabilized?
- Chris
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
