Hello,
Looks like my original patch got held up at moderation, so trying
again from a different address. This patch removes the need for a
special anaconda option to install onto BTRFS, which has become stable
enough for wider testing. This is based on what is done for XFS, so
hopefully it's right. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/pyanaconda/storage/formats/fs.py b/pyanaconda/storage/formats/fs.py
index c3ea79c..0d01fd4 100644
--- a/pyanaconda/storage/formats/fs.py
+++ b/pyanaconda/storage/formats/fs.py
@@ -1101,7 +1101,7 @@ class BTRFS(FS):
_linuxNative = True
_bootable = False
_maxLabelChars = 256
- _supported = False
+ _supported = True
_dump = True
_check = True
_packages = ["btrfs-progs"]
@@ -1125,15 +1125,6 @@ class BTRFS(FS):
argv = ["-r", "%dm" % (self.targetSize,), self.device]
return argv
- @property
- def supported(self):
- """ Is this filesystem a supported type? """
- supported = self._supported
- if flags.cmdline.has_key("btrfs"):
- supported = self.utilsAvailable
-
- return supported
-
register_device_format(BTRFS)
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
