Chris Lumens wrote: >> Yeah I agree, (sorry for the previous one-liner, must remember to read >> thread before replying...) >> >> I have no particular love for reiserfs, but unless it's causing some sort >> of big burden to anaconda maintainers, I don't see any reason to remove >> it, it just limits people's choices. Putting it behind the boot-time >> option makes it very clear that it's not a standard operation, but hey >> if you know what you're doing, go for it ... > > The year is 2010. reiserfs was marked as unsupported with this commit: > > commit 4ba6b2226f860e850112b15d61559dca3da04167 > Author: Mike Fulbright <msf@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri Jul 13 20:16:32 2001 +0000 > > as per kernel team orders, turning off support for reiserfs > > We've always taken the stance that we've got support, but we don't care > about any bug reports related to it. Either we support something, or we > don't. Should we keep pretending a little longer than nine years? *shrug* don't care that much (though I'd say there are many other large swaths of the fedora kernel that we can't -really- natively support)... But hey, if it suits you, chop chop. :) -Eric > - Chris _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
