Both look fine.
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 21:46 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> If we somehow get this wrong it is better to signal so right away.
>
> Related: rhbz#591970
> ---
> pyanaconda/storage/devicetree.py | 6 ++++++
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/pyanaconda/storage/devicetree.py b/pyanaconda/storage/devicetree.py
> index ef53db4..8ee8671 100644
> --- a/pyanaconda/storage/devicetree.py
> +++ b/pyanaconda/storage/devicetree.py
> @@ -1059,6 +1059,12 @@ class DeviceTree(object):
> # try to get the device again now that we've got all the slaves
> device = self.getDeviceByName(name)
>
> + if device is None:
> + device = self.getDeviceByUuid(info.get("MD_UUID"))
> + if device:
> + raise DeviceTreeError("MD RAID device %s already in "
> + "devicetree as %s" % (name, device.name))
> +
> # if we get here, we found all of the slave devices and
> # something must be wrong -- if all of the slaves we in
> # the tree, this device should be as well
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
