> People think that they need to select the disks which they want to > install to, so if they for example have 2 disks, 1 with windows, > and 1 free disk, they only select the free disk. I've tried to take care of some of this confusion with recent string changes to ui/filter.glade (c8237ba25bef2d749c8fb128516a9fe9e187b55f in particular), and I'm hoping we can take care of some more of it in documentation. Still, it's a new screen in partitioning land and will require getting used to. There's always room for improvement though. > 1) When basic storage configuration is shown, simply skip the > filter UI completely (leaving exclusive disks empty, and behaving > as pre filter-ui and as kickstart still works). This has the > IMHO large advantage of removing the confusion with having 2 disk > selection screens. We could certainly do this. However, it means there's nowhere for the user to select the boot device, as that's currently only on the cleardisks screen. > 2) In the clear disks ui, make the boot device a drop down below > the 2 disk panes, much like it was before the UI changes. As the bugs > we've been getting about it being unclear how to select which disk > to boot from, and the above use case illustrate what we currently > have does not work all that well from a UI pov. We could also do that, in which case I'd just want to kill the existing "Boot Device" column in the right hand pane. I'm not sure that a drop down fits in the existing UI very well, but it's worth exploring. What we've currently got is a tradeoff anyway. The original design included a separate screen for just the boot device selection, but I wanted to keep the number of new screens to a minimum. Hence the column that you see today. If we can come up with a way to make it not look out of place, I'm okay with adding another widget there. - Chris _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list