On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 11:33 -0400, Chris Lumens wrote: > My suggestion is we start by determining which methods are the highest > maintainence burden. Which result in the most bugs? Which are tested > the least? Which involve the trickiest code? Which have the least > valid use cases? Then, we work on killing those methods. Might as well > get the biggest bang for our code removal buck. > First off, I'd say anything that involves isos seems pretty tricky from our code point of view, finding the right ones to loop back mount and handling all those mounts, etc.. Unfortunately having the end user either loop back mount themselves or try to extract content is also wrought with failure, due to end user mistakes. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
