-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010, Brian C. Lane wrote:
On 04/28/2010 12:49 AM, Radek Vykydal wrote:
Thanks for the review.
Thanks for the explanations.
Is there a better way to do this than to do a series of patches that
modify earlier patches? I know part of my difficulty is unfamiliarity
with the code, but I expect that it makes reviewing things, especially
ones as big as this, hard for everyone.
I actually ran out of steam about half way through the patchset.
ReviewBoard is supposed to make this process easier, so once we can really
start using that more, I think posting revisions will be easier.
For email threads, I suggest people make the change(s) suggested and then
commit it to their local branch. Do an interactive rebase and squash the
change back in to the original patch you sent. You can then send that patch
to the list and note that it's a revision. Not very elegant, but eliminates
the "patches for patches" problem.
- --
David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Red Hat / Honolulu, HI
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkvYiPIACgkQ5hsjjIy1VkmPRgCgpHFGz6QwvFLLC2+MrrAVFrZg
Ek4AoMOROL1VIUqtvnTHXLvM9eudjAG/
=xuc3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
