Re: [PATCH 2/2] Make sure we use 1.0 mdraid metadata when the set is used for boot (#584596)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 04/23/2010 01:21 PM, James Laska wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 09:41 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,

On 04/22/2010 10:42 PM, David Lehman wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 21:39 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
What do you think about this patch and F-13 branch I'm a bit undecided myself
I know fedora users do mdraid 1 installs, and if they choose to not have
a separate /boot this will bite them, otoh we could just do a release note
telling them to create a separate /boot.

I would be satisfied with either approach for F13. I'd like to get
feedback from rel-eng and QA and at least one other member of our team
before making a decision if that suits you.


I tried to back port the patches, but turns out to not be 100% trivial,
so lets just release note it.

So how do we make sure we get this included in the release notes ?

If this is part of a feature or intended behavior change, release notes
is the right place for this.  The many different ways to contribute
release notes content are described at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject/ReleaseNotes/Process#Six_Ways_to_Submit_a_Release_Note

Otherwise, if this is from an unintentional change, and we anticipate a
fair amount of questions/concerns on the issue, the Common bugs wiki
might be a better fit.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F13_bugs


Thanks for the input, I've added an entry to the Common_F13_bugs wiki page.

Regards,

Hans

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux