On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 09:41 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 04/22/2010 10:42 PM, David Lehman wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 21:39 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> What do you think about this patch and F-13 branch I'm a bit undecided myself > >> I know fedora users do mdraid 1 installs, and if they choose to not have > >> a separate /boot this will bite them, otoh we could just do a release note > >> telling them to create a separate /boot. > > > > I would be satisfied with either approach for F13. I'd like to get > > feedback from rel-eng and QA and at least one other member of our team > > before making a decision if that suits you. > > > > I tried to back port the patches, but turns out to not be 100% trivial, > so lets just release note it. > > So how do we make sure we get this included in the release notes ? If this is part of a feature or intended behavior change, release notes is the right place for this. The many different ways to contribute release notes content are described at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject/ReleaseNotes/Process#Six_Ways_to_Submit_a_Release_Note Otherwise, if this is from an unintentional change, and we anticipate a fair amount of questions/concerns on the issue, the Common bugs wiki might be a better fit. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F13_bugs Thanks, James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
