On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 17:22 -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/31/2010 12:04 PM, David Cantrell wrote: > > > > > 1) The scripts that are executed by tools like pungi or revisor should > > go in > > /usr/libexec/anaconda rather than /usr/share/anaconda. These would be > > buildinstall and related scripts. Really, any of the scripts that can be > > executed as-is and are typically used by other programs rather than the > > user > > directly. > > Wouldn't it be better to further split things up and make stand-alone > scripts live in their own package, say anaconda-tools or anaconda-devel? > I may have read something about doing that on irc or the list, I don't > remember. > They used to be their own package, anaconda-runtime. They were pulled back in at some point, git log will show when, but I think Jeremy was the one leading that charge. That said, it does make sense for things like the Live CD where they want the installer executable, but not necessarily all the gunk to make images and all the deps therein. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
