Re: [PATCH] If no devices were found do not SIGSEGV (#567939)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/05/2010 02:17 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,

On 03/05/2010 11:13 AM, Martin Sivak wrote:
Hi,

Well.. this is ugly too :) And does not reflect the logic.. of course
compiler would probably optimize it into my form anyways :)


If you insist on doing things your way, please do it properly and but
the if and for on a separate line and indent the for block.


I think so too.

All the ways to write this are ugly, but this one is at least systematic.

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux