Hello, Lorax has it's own git repo, and as I understand, it should be a separate package, not a part of anaconda. Here's lorax web https://fedorahosted.org/lorax/ But I'm working on some changes now, so it's a little broken, and I have to fix it, before commiting the new stuff, so the git repo has old stuff. :) -- Martin Gracik ----- "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On 02/10/2010 09:11 AM, Martin Gracik wrote: > > Hello, > > > > yeah, we know buildinstall isn't perfect, that's why it's being > rewritten now. > > I hope that the new code will be working a lot better. > > > > Martin, > > Do you have Lorax (John that is the buildscripts rewrite) hosted > somewhere? > > Are we going to put this inside anaconda again, or maybe we should > give Lorax > its own git ? > > Either way if you put a tarbal somewhere, then maybe John is > interested in testing > it, John ? > > Regards, > > Hans > > > > -- > > > > Martin Gracik > > > > ----- "John Reiser"<jreiser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Did buildinstall.functions (and/or mkinitrd), which is now written > >> in bash, used to be written in some other language, such as > python? > >> get_dso_deps contains a comment "I still hate shell." > >> > >> I have been building and testing a DVD from rawhide daily using > >> pungi. Building takes about 40 to 45 minutes: 10 minutes user > CPU, > >> 14 minutes system CPU, and 16 to 20 minutes download. > >> > >> I'd like that to be faster, say 8 to 10 minutes plus download. > >> After Bug 559647 (quadratic work: genisoimage per .rpm) then > >> the next longest piece is upd-instroot. "strace -f -c" shows > >> that there are over 125,000 successful execve(). Now install.img > >> has around 14,600 files, so the average is more than 8 execve > >> per file. A detailed examination using strace shows over 97,000 > >> execve by upd-instroot: > >> 34573 upd-instroot execve("/usr/bin/dirname", > >> 15167 upd-instroot execve("/bin/cp", > >> 12513 upd-instroot execve("/bin/egrep", > >> 11478 upd-instroot execve("/usr/bin/file", > >> 5538 upd-instroot execve("/bin/sed", > >> 5010 upd-instroot execve("/bin/basename", > >> 3675 upd-instroot execve("/usr/bin/readlink", > >> 3090 upd-instroot execve("/usr/sbin/chroot", > >> 2264 upd-instroot execve("/bin/rm", > >> 1134 upd-instroot execve("/bin/ln", > >> 1046 upd-instroot execve("/bin/grep", > >> 1031 upd-instroot execve("/lib64/ld-2.11.90.so", > >> 1030 upd-instroot execve("/bin/uname", > >> 703 upd-instroot execve("/usr/bin/find", > >> 627 upd-instroot execve("/bin/mkdir", > >> [snip] > >> and the culprits are instFile() and get_dso_deps() and callers. > >> One process making some direct calls per file, instead of > >> clone+execve several times per file, should be much faster. > >> > >> -- > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list > >> Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list > > Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list > > _______________________________________________ > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list > Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
