On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 16:55 -1000, David Cantrell wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Chris Lumens wrote: > > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_User_Interface_Cmdline > >> > >> As I understand it, the cmdline case is important for platforms that > >> don't support newt console output (e.g. s390x). However, it's been > >> leveraged heavily by test automation as it makes for easier to follow > >> test logs. This is a lightweight test for us to continue with, so I'd > >> be comfortable assigning this a priority of Beta. Thoughts/concerns? > > > > Agreed as to the users. I'm curious why you give this a different > > priority from serial console, though. It feels like serial and cmdline > > have the same set of use cases and should be tested at the same level. > > Serial console installs can still be interactive, whereas the cmdline mode > requires a kickstart file and is really just a progress indicator (right?). > Despite being named cmdline mode, I'm pretty sure it's not at all interactive. That's my understanding. David, you probably know better than me, but since prompting on a 3270 console isn't an option, all cmdline installs should not be interactive. Thanks, James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
