Re: [PATCH] time for instdata to die

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, clumens@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

This is a lot to test.  My plan is to either make a gigantic updates.img
or a local test build and compose.  Then I'll put it through some basic
testing (text, graphical, kickstart, vnc, encryption all come to mind as
important).

I had to make two very small modifications to my patch set.  After that,
all tests either succeed or fail in non-instdata ways that we already
know about.  This is encouraging.

Ack on the whole set.  Nothing jumped out at me and pychecker didn't seem to
mind the changes.

- -- David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Red Hat / Honolulu, HI

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAktsuwQACgkQ5hsjjIy1VkkKnwCg14UFdLZKpk0Ba9pPiNesIOmI
AscAnRngC1Dyyf6eBfXWQUfMooCxWXLz
=ZG+t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux