Hi,
On 01/25/2010 03:36 PM, Chris Lumens wrote:
diff --git a/iw/filter_gui.py b/iw/filter_gui.py
index 3b6f573..a0f6704 100644
--- a/iw/filter_gui.py
+++ b/iw/filter_gui.py
@@ -586,6 +586,10 @@ class FilterWindow(InstallWindow):
except (_ped.IOException, _ped.DeviceException):
continue
d["XXX_SIZE"] = int(partedDevice.getSize())
+ # cciss controllers, without any sets defined, show up as a 0 size
+ # blockdev, ignore these
+ if d["XXX_SIZE"] == 0:
+ continue
# This isn't so great, but for iSCSI devices the path contains a lot
# of useful identifiying info that should be displayed.
Should these perhaps be excluded at a lower level, like perhaps in
__is_blacklisted_blockdev or udev_enumerate_block_devices? This feels
like too much of a hack to me.
That would be a good idea, yes. But that would require figuring out something in
udev to tell from this is the case (or doing some sysfs grobing in one of
those 2 functions.
Either of which needs access to such a machine to actually see what is there
to trigger this blacklisting on.
The above patch is the tried and proven way of handling this from
mediaPresent in devices.py (and yes I know you object to the naming of mediaPresent
and I agree).
When doing the usb reader fix (which is also being handled through mediaPresent in
devices.py), it occured to me (some time later) that filter ui would also need a
fix for the bizarro 0 bytes large cciss block node case.
IOW I agree, but I think that for now this is the best way of dealing with this,
and then later we can make it prettier.
Regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list