Re: [PATCH 2/8] Fixup MDRaidArrayDevice.biosraid

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hans de Goede wrote:
The containers are purely an intermediate device, which we need in the tree
for parent child relations, etc. But they should never be used in any way.
I'm aware of all of this. My question was "_Can_ users create containers
and then create native-metadata arrays inside those containers
manually?"

AFAIK that is not possible. Arrays inside containers don't have metadata,
only the container has. IOW arrays inside containers always have the
metadata type of the container (as they use the metadata from there), and
that metadata type always is external.


Correct. The container is only there for userspace to track which arrays belong to the same metadata set (N:1 arrays per metadata set). MD metadata in comparison is always 1:1 (arrays per metadata) set so there really isn't room for the container concept. And MD metadata is managed by the kernel so we don't need this intermediate step in the assembly process for userspace to evaluate the "candidate" disks (container members) before starting the arrays inside the container.

--
Dan

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux