> diff --git a/storage/devicetree.py b/storage/devicetree.py
> index ffc1c90..4fb4e6c 100644
> --- a/storage/devicetree.py
> +++ b/storage/devicetree.py
> @@ -898,8 +898,9 @@ class DeviceTree(object):
> if udev_device_get_md_container(info) and \
> udev_device_get_md_name(info):
> md_name = udev_device_get_md_name(info)
> - for disk in self.exclusiveDisks:
> - if re.match("isw_[a-z]*_%s" % md_name, disk):
> + for i in range(0, len(self.exclusiveDisks)):
> + if re.match("isw_[a-z]*_%s" % md_name, self.exclusiveDisks[i]):
> + self.exclusiveDisks[i] = name
> return False
>
> if udev_device_is_disk(info) and \
The one thing that worries me here is that we're adding another
iteration over exclusiveDisks, which could potentially be very large.
However it's probably not worth worrying about until we test this stuff
out on a machine with tons of disks.
This looks fine, and reminds me that cleardisks_gui.py needs to become
more clever about what it does and does not display, instead of just
trusting exclusiveDisks to contain all the right information.
- Chris
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
