Re: [PATCH 3/6] Create multipath.conf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> Why would we ignore them? We no longer blindly assume that everything
>> resembling a disk has a disklabel, so there's no reason to pretend that
>> biosraid/mpath member disks aren't there when they are.
> 
> Well, here I was just wrong (notice the patch already posted that takes
> that line out... ;) ).
> 
> The other place I'm calling AddIgnoredDisks(parent), the thought was to
> remove them from the UI in the partitioning screen.  Doesn't work though,
> so I should figure out something else there as well.

Of course, I already took that other call out.  So I was just confused when
replying to you is all.

-- 
        Peter

What we need is either less corruption, or more chances to
participate in it.

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux