Re: [PATCH 3/6] Create multipath.conf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/21/2010 01:47 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
> On 01/20/2010 07:31 PM, David Lehman wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 19:03 -0500, Peter Jones wrote:
>>> Revamp this since multipath is now writing our rules for us.
>>>
>>> Use device.serial/device.vendor/device.model where appropriate, and
>>> don't give the device a braindead mode.  Also change /when/ we write the
>>> files out.
>>> ---
>>>  storage/__init__.py         |   11 +
>>>  storage/devicelibs/mpath.py |  517 +++----------------------------------------
>>>  storage/devices.py          |   10 +-
>>>  storage/devicetree.py       |   27 ++-
>>>  4 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 500 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/storage/devicetree.py b/storage/devicetree.py
>>> index 4356ca5..5fa68f6 100644
>>> --- a/storage/devicetree.py
>>> +++ b/storage/devicetree.py
>>> @@ -1912,10 +1919,24 @@ class DeviceTree(object):
>>>  
>>>          # Having found all the disks, we can now find all the multipaths built
>>>          # upon them.
>>> -        for mp in self.__multipaths.values():
>>> +        whitelist = []
>>> +        mpaths = self.__multipaths.values()
>>> +        mpaths.sort(key=lambda d: d.name)
>>> +        for mp in mpaths:
>>>              log.info("adding mpath device %s" % mp.name)
>>>              mp.setup()
>>> +            whitelist.append(mp.name)
>>> +            for p in mp.parents:
>>> +                self.addIgnoredDisk(p)
>>
>> I thought it was decided today that mpath member disks should not be
>> ignored, since that's the case for biosraid member disks.
> 
> Was it?  I thought we decided that multipath members shouldn't be
> automatically filtered out by isIgnored(), since that prevents them from
> being recognized in addUdevDevice(), which we need to process them.  But
> once we've done that, /manually/ ignoring them doesn't have the same
> problem.

... but obviously in this piece of code, you're right, ignoring them is
also bad.  Okay, I'll take that out.

-- 
        Peter

What we need is either less corruption, or more chances to
participate in it.

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux