Sure, but I still need more features than just unpacking the RPMs. And though it is possible to implement it using command line arguments and stdout parsing, the library approach is much easier. Martin ----- "Chris Lumens" <clumens@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > FWIW, I agree with Martin that we need his approach for now, which > is > > isolated, and can rip it out and switch over to a pure RPM-based > one > > later. > > There's a trap here. Once we've written and committed something, > it's > in. As long as it works, no one will really want to touch it to use > rpm, and everyone will be too busy to really think about it. Add in > the > fact that it'll be in RHEL and therefore be much harder to change. > > - Chris > > _______________________________________________ > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list > Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
