-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Steffen Maier wrote:
On 08/27/2009 10:19 PM, David Cantrell wrote:
diff --git a/scripts/mk-images b/scripts/mk-images
+ for cmd in arp qetharp qetharp-2.6 qethconf lsqeth lscss lschp \
+ lsreipl lsdasd dasdview dasdinfo lszfcp ; do
+ instbin $IMGPATH /usr/sbin/$cmd $MBD_DIR /sbin/$cmd
+ done
diff --git a/scripts/upd-instroot b/scripts/upd-instroot
index 5534520..6864586 100755
--- a/scripts/upd-instroot
+++ b/scripts/upd-instroot
@@ -221,11 +221,11 @@ if [ $ARCH = ia64 ]; then
fi
if [ $ARCH = s390 -o $ARCH = s390x ]; then
- PACKAGES="$PACKAGES s390utils binutils libgcc tcp_wrappers
- sed net-tools openssh openssh-server coreutils
- login initscripts portmap pam
- login mount modutils s390utils-cmsfs
- strace xorg-x11-xauth xorg-x11-libs"
+ PACKAGES="bind-utils binutils coreutils findutils gzip initscripts
+ iputils less libgcc login lsscsi modutils mount net-tools
+ openssh openssh-clients openssh-server pam portmap s390utils
+ s390utils-base s390utils-cmsfs sed strace tar tcp_wrappers
Is $PACKAGES as first item for the new PACKAGES gone intentionally?
Whoops. My mistake.
s390utils is a meta package for installing all s390utils sub packages.
Do we want to suck in all with only s390utils and leave out the then
unnecessary subset of sub packages s390utils-base s390utils-cmsfs?
I'll change it to just list s390utils. The redundancy doesn't really matter
here as all the packages would get installed anyway.
+ xorg-x11-libs xorg-x11-xauth"
fi
if [ $ARCH = ppc -o $ARCH = ppc64 ]; then
@@ -663,6 +663,68 @@ EOF
if [ $ARCH = s390 -o $ARCH = s390x ]; then
cat >> $KEEPFILE <<EOF
+sbin/qetharp*
# ls -1 /sbin/qetharp*
/sbin/qetharp
/sbin/qetharp-2.4
/sbin/qetharp-2.6
This would also include the version for Linux kernel 2.4, which I
thought we wouldn't need and therefore enumerated qetharp (frontend) and
qetharp-2.6 (backend) explicitly in mk-images. Maybe we want to do that
here as well, if we don't want to knowingly keep unnecessary files.
I'll change it so -2.4 isn't included.
- --
David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Red Hat / Honolulu, HI
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkqYQegACgkQ5hsjjIy1Vkl6ngCaAqU/c01FA5kUfKDF8f62UT1r
WlcAnjH8KruYscORbQwro30k7hVeSMwf
=an0r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
