On 08/27/2009 10:19 PM, David Cantrell wrote: > diff --git a/scripts/mk-images b/scripts/mk-images > + for cmd in arp qetharp qetharp-2.6 qethconf lsqeth lscss lschp \ > + lsreipl lsdasd dasdview dasdinfo lszfcp ; do > + instbin $IMGPATH /usr/sbin/$cmd $MBD_DIR /sbin/$cmd > + done > diff --git a/scripts/upd-instroot b/scripts/upd-instroot > index 5534520..6864586 100755 > --- a/scripts/upd-instroot > +++ b/scripts/upd-instroot > @@ -221,11 +221,11 @@ if [ $ARCH = ia64 ]; then > fi > > if [ $ARCH = s390 -o $ARCH = s390x ]; then > - PACKAGES="$PACKAGES s390utils binutils libgcc tcp_wrappers > - sed net-tools openssh openssh-server coreutils > - login initscripts portmap pam > - login mount modutils s390utils-cmsfs > - strace xorg-x11-xauth xorg-x11-libs" > + PACKAGES="bind-utils binutils coreutils findutils gzip initscripts > + iputils less libgcc login lsscsi modutils mount net-tools > + openssh openssh-clients openssh-server pam portmap s390utils > + s390utils-base s390utils-cmsfs sed strace tar tcp_wrappers Is $PACKAGES as first item for the new PACKAGES gone intentionally? s390utils is a meta package for installing all s390utils sub packages. Do we want to suck in all with only s390utils and leave out the then unnecessary subset of sub packages s390utils-base s390utils-cmsfs? > + xorg-x11-libs xorg-x11-xauth" > fi > > if [ $ARCH = ppc -o $ARCH = ppc64 ]; then > @@ -663,6 +663,68 @@ EOF > > if [ $ARCH = s390 -o $ARCH = s390x ]; then > cat >> $KEEPFILE <<EOF > +sbin/qetharp* # ls -1 /sbin/qetharp* /sbin/qetharp /sbin/qetharp-2.4 /sbin/qetharp-2.6 This would also include the version for Linux kernel 2.4, which I thought we wouldn't need and therefore enumerated qetharp (frontend) and qetharp-2.6 (backend) explicitly in mk-images. Maybe we want to do that here as well, if we don't want to knowingly keep unnecessary files. Steffen Linux on System z Development IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martin Jetter Geschäftsführung: Erich Baier Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294 _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
