On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:00:23PM -0400, Chris Lumens wrote: > > storage/devicetree.py | 18 ++++++++---------- > > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > In 517926, Jesse refers to a second bug that then got duped back to it. > Does this patch do anything to cause/correct that second bug? My thing with the second bug was that it was produced while using a updates image, so the traceback contains update image code. And might (not sure) be due to some screw up in the image. Or a combination of both the kickstart issue and the image being screwed up. Since we (Jesse and me) looked into and tested the posted patch, I decided to close that bug. I would prefer, for the kickstart issue, to have a different bug open, with code that does not include any updates images. Regards. > > Otherwise, looks okay to me. > > - Chris > > _______________________________________________ > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list > Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list -- Joel Andres Granados Brno, Czech Republic, Red Hat.
Attachment:
pgpkFkUwFmJDJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
