> Another good one I modelled this after zfcp, which uses a writepriority of > 0, but looking at iscsi this might be wrong, iscsi uses a write prio of 71, > which makes more sense as this must be written before any commands which > refer to disks (so before any partitioning commands). > > So would 71 be a good prio for this too ? (and should we fix zfcp ?) Yes, 71 would be good. Basically, anything that is needed to set up disks before the usual set of partitioning commands (part, raid, logvol, volgroup) or the clearpart/zerombr set should get a priority of 71. I'm not sure whether zfcp falls into this category or not, but for consistency it should probably be modified. If I really had free time, I'd ditch the concept of writePriority and allow commands to specify which other commands they must come before, then tsort them, etc. But that might just be too fancy for something this simple. - Chris _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
