On 04/23/2009 08:59 PM, David Lehman wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 20:52 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: This whole thing seems so ineffective to me. I don't understand why we remove devices from the device tree for this. If we find a broken VG, we should simply remove the VG and and LV devices from the device tree, blacklist the VG's name, and carry on. No prompting, no special handling. If it's broken, ignore it. Same for mdraid.
p.s. I'm going to commit my patch as is, sorry about this, but I really need to wrap up my F-11 work and start working on the huge pile of 5.4 work I have. Since this fixes a real world scenario backtrace I think its better to have some fix in now and revisit this later. Regards, Hans _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
