On 04/10/2009 03:14 PM, Jacek Danecki wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Same question as before, what will happen with an unpatched mdadm ?
If we use patched mdadm we can create this DeviceTree:
/dev/md/imsm0: None on mdarray
/dev/md126: None on disk
/dev/sda: mdmember on storage device
/dev/sdc: mdmember on storage device
With unpatched mdadm we have only:
/dev/sda: mdmember on storage device
/dev/sdc: mdmember on storage device
IOW with an unpatched mdadm mdraid isw does not work, ok.
Or to put it differently what is the status of getting this patch
in to Fedora ?
As I know Dan will push our patches to the Neil mdadm repository. But
there is small issue, support for DDF format is different then for
native/isw format.
Should I send patch for mdadm directly to the Doug?
If you want to get mdadm isw support testable in F-11 that would be a good
idea yes.
Regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
