Re: [PATCH 1/6] New udev rule for using mdadm for isw_raid_member

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hans de Goede wrote:
Same question as before, what will happen with an unpatched mdadm ?

If we use patched mdadm we can create this DeviceTree:

/dev/md/imsm0: None on mdarray
/dev/md126: None on disk
/dev/sda: mdmember on storage device
/dev/sdc: mdmember on storage device

With unpatched mdadm we have only:

/dev/sda: mdmember on storage device
/dev/sdc: mdmember on storage device


Or to put it differently what is the status of getting this patch
in to Fedora ?

As I know Dan will push our patches to the Neil mdadm repository. But there is small issue, support for DDF format is different then for native/isw format.
Should I send patch for mdadm directly to the Doug?

Regards,
Jacek



_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux