Greetings ... Thanks again for a quick repsonce and great ideas ... Sorry for late reply ... 2009/3/12 Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx>: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:15:38 +0200, > Clinton Lee Taylor <clintonlee.taylor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I will admit, I have not studied the on-disk format of ext2/3/4 or >> RAID1, the last time I did this, was in the good old days of DOS and >> FAT12/16 ... We really looking for only one case, RAID1, I don't see a >> need for anything else, in this topic's reguard ... Does RAID1 require >> twice as many superblocks as a standard ext3 partition? That is if we >> are talking about making a dirty conversion problem ... > > If you are just worried about raid 1, I would recommend not supporting > degraded arrays, but rather allow raid 1 arrays with only 1 element. > This will be safer and doing the prep work isn't too hard. Okay, I would not say worried, I would say interested ... ;-) I think I'm going to wait until the storage rewritte is complete and then work a little more on this ... In the mean time, I'm going to start to test some of the ideas that I have from this discuss ... Will report back after I see how things go ... Chat again soon Mailed LeeT _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
