On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 09:02:15PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 18:55 -1000, David Cantrell wrote: > > I don't think we should be making this change, at least at this point in time. > > The reason we're making it now is because the behavior didn't become > apparent until /after/ we killed betanag, and since that was extremely > late in the cycle we have to fix things extremely late in the cycle. > Perhaps next time it would be prudent to do a test build in the "final > format" prior to this point in the schedule. Yes, I think we should do that for F-11. > > If we don't want specific repos visible in the list, then we should remove the > > .repo file from the install.img -or- the fedora-release package should not be > > providing them for the F-10 release in the first place. > > I'm not going to remove the rawhide repo from the fedora-release, it's > how people get moved to rawhide when they want to make that jump. If > you want to work out some way to filter rawhide like repos at > buildinstall time, have at it I guess. It would be interesting to see > how this could be done in a non-Fedora specific kind of way. And I don't think we should be making non-blocking changes to anaconda at this point in the release cycle. > > To me, this seems like putting the fix in the wrong place. I'll agree that > > not displaying the rawhide or updates-testing repo in the list is reasonable > > for F-10, but the fix for that shouldn't go in anaconda. Like Chris said, > > we're trying to get away from tying anaconda to specific releases. > > I honestly don't see why the line has to be at "show me every > repo" (except for the ones that have -debuginfo or -source in the > name...) instead of "show me the repos that would be enabled by default > post-install" which seems to me to be a much safer set to offer the > user. As Chris explained, that change was requested specifically in July, so now we're talking about changing it at the last minute. I personally don't view this change as blocking, so I don't think it should be made. -- David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx> Red Hat / Honolulu, HI
Attachment:
pgpmmqDZFpxOd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
