On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 07:43 -1000, David Cantrell wrote: > The driving goal for me has been "get rid of libdhcp fast". So I put > this patch together hoping I could merge it in to rawhide sooner > rather than later and then have some time to work up a move-to-NM > patch. If people want to skip that interim step entirely, I'm cool > with that and can go ahead and start moving it to NM entirely. Not > knowing how long that would take, I just focused on removing libdhcp > for now and leaving our current functionality in place. Fair enough... I just think that we might as well get the real end goal in place, even if it takes a little bit longer. It will end up saving effort overall as we won't have to fix things in the interim step. [snip] > > The right fix for mkinitrd given the direction we continue to move in > > there is probably to switch away from nash builtins and just suck in > > the > > appropriate utilities into the initrd. But that's not an easy move > > either. > > That's an entire project by itself, I think. Yep. Hence, I wouldn't try and tie it at all to this set of changes. Which might mean that libdhcp sticks around for a minor case for a little bit longer, but hopefully not that much longer. Jeremy _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
