On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 07:48 -1000, David Cantrell wrote: > On May 21, 2008, at 5:50 AM, Elliot Peele wrote: > > What about distros that don't use NetworkManager? Will there be a fall > > back? If we are using NetworkManager with Anaconda will it still able > > able to generate "classic" network configuration? > > > Personally, I'd rather not allow users the option to create a classic > set of ifcfg-* files if we are doing NM by default. As long as it's > an option, people will still use it, which means we'll still have to > support multiple ways of configuring network devices on the target > system. If we're going NM for everything, it should be NM for > everything. Generating ifcfg-* files is still sane with NetworkManager, though. It uses them for the system-settings backend Jeremy _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
