Re: [PATCH] Don't depend on product path for finding the anaconda-runtime package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 18:33 +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> Would it be plausible to tail -n 1 it instead? I'm sure the compose 
> tools should only pull in one version but given the way some of these 
> resolve dependencies they might pull in two versions (or more) and tail 
> would get the latest -which may or may not have been modified by a third 
> party.
> 
> Does that sound plausible? If so, need a patch?

The first was done (iirc) because that ends up being nicer for some of
the ppc/ppc64 cases if you end up with more than one in the tree

Jeremy

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux